Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Telegraph publishes "dossier of collision data" involving "rogue cyclists" in London parks, as Royal Parks continues campaign for new laws to prosecute 'speeding' cyclists

The charity that runs London green spaces such as Richmond Park and Regent's Park has asked the government to amend legislation to let it "set speed limits for cyclists" in its parks and for riders above 20mph limit to be prosecuted...

The Telegraph newspaper this weekend published information from a "dossier of collision data" from The Royal Parks in London and claimed it revealed "the full threat posed to pedestrians by dangerous and illegal cycling in the country's most famous parks".

It was released, the newspaper said, using freedom of information laws and listed incidents involving cyclists in the eight London green spaces that are run by The Royal Parks charity, but mainly related to Richmond Park and Regent's Park, the two most popular with the capital's sport cyclists.

Marking its release, a Royal Parks spokesperson suggested that while cycling has a "deep-rooted history" in the parks, the "speeds that can now be achieved when cycling in such populated spaces bring new challenges that we are committed to addressing". Last month, the charity asked the government to amend legislation "with a view to setting speed limits for cyclists" in its parks which, if introduced, could see riders exceeding 20mph speed limits prosecuted — something a source at the Department for Culture Media and Sport reportedly told the newspaper is still being considered.

 In the article, titled 'How rogue cyclists in London's parks have knocked down children and the elderly', The Telegraph published information from the dossier and said it referenced "'speeding' and 'aggressive' cyclists being involved in hit and runs, ignoring zebra crossings, travelling on illegal bikes and hitting pedestrians so hard they are 'catapulted' into the air."

> Cyclists riding "at excessive speeds" and causing crashes prompt Royal Parks to review cycling policy, as charity cancels time trial events because "they directly encourage cyclists to go faster than speed limit"

Richmond Park and Regent's Park saw the most reports, one of which was the collision at the latter park where, in 2022, 81-year-old Hilda Griffiths was hit by Brian Fitzgerald as he rode at 29mph, injuries she died from in hospital two months later.

Another incident from Regent's Park reportedly noted a pedestrian suffering two broken ribs in a collision with a cyclist "doing laps" of the park, however The Telegraph piece does also state that the injured pedestrian "admitted not looking properly" when crossing the road.

One cyclist commenting online suggested the interpretation of the dossier's reports was "just bat***t" and highlighted that one of the six Regent's Park incidents reported over the four-year period was a cyclist losing consciousness and their riding mates crashing as a result, hardly the "rogue cyclists" promised in the headline. Another report was from a cyclist who felt "unsafe" due to others "riding on his wheel".

In Richmond Park, The Telegraph says a pedestrian was, in February, hit "at speed" on a "busy" path by a cyclist riding a "fixed wheel bike" that was "not road legal". In August, a pedestrian was reportedly hospitalised with "multiple serious injuries to arm, head and hip" by a "speeding cyclist" who then "fled the scene".

The file from the summer reportedly includes a note from a runner who said he will not visit the park as "it is becoming so dangerous".

Richmond Park 03 copyright Simon MacMichael

"I've on four occasions nearly been hit by a speeding bike. It's all well and good saying pedestrians have priority but it's clear that many cyclists (not all of course) are not adhering to this rule," he reportedly added, the newspaper also suggesting there were "numerous reports" of cyclists going "at least 30mph", "full pelt" or "out of control" over the past four years in Richmond Park.

The dossier also reportedly notes two incidents in the park in 2020, one seeing a partially sighted pedestrian "knocked to the ground" by a cyclist who had his "head down because of the wind", the second incident reporting a "very fast" cyclist "on the wrong side of the road crashed head-on into another cyclist".

Due to the quieter roads and continuous loops offered by Richmond Park and Regent's Park, the green spaces are popular training and riding destinations for leisure and sport cyclists in the city who ride laps of the routes. Some of the other London parks ran by The Royal Parks are primarily used as through-routes by riders, the dossier also reportedly referencing collisions, near misses or incidents in Hyde Park, Kensington Gardens, St James's Park and Bushy Park.

During the summer, The Royal Parks cited cyclists riding "at excessive speeds" and causing crashes as the reason for it reviewing its cycling policy, while also cancelling early-morning time trial events in Richmond Park and the London Duathlon.

In May, Strava deleted "Regent's Park as a segment on the app" following pressure from The Royal Parks, the move coming following the death of a pensioner who died from her injuries sustained in a collision with a cyclist riding laps of the park at 25-29mph.

Regent's Park and Outer Circle Strava segment (Google Maps/Strava)

In a letter to Sir Chris Bryant, the Minister for Creative Industries, Arts and Tourism, The Royal Parks' chairman Loyd Grossman (the former presenter of MasterChef and Through the Keyhole) asked government to amend laws so that cyclists failing to adhere to the parks' 20mph speed limits can be prosecuted for speeding.

Providing an update a month later, a source at the Department for Culture Media and Sport confirmed the government had "received a proposal to improve safety for park users" and "are considering it".

A Royal Parks spokesperson told The Telegraph: "The parks are shared spaces where pedestrians, cyclists and wildlife coexist, and we have a responsibility to all park users to ensure we are acting in a way that protects and promotes their safety. We continue to work closely with cycling groups, community groups and the Met Police to do all we can to ensure the parks can be enjoyed safely by everyone, now and in the future."

She suggested the cycling policies had been reviewed due to "several cycling-related incidents linked to a minority of people cycling at excessive speeds" and "implemented physical changes in the parks, including larger or wider pedestrian paths, additional crossing points to improve pedestrian safety and additional signage".

Discussions around speed limits in The Royal Parks, notably Richmond Park, have been long running. Despite initially suggesting speed limits did apply to cyclists, in 2021 it was confirmed that the park's speed limits (which range from 5mph to 20mph) do not apply to cyclists, a stance in line with the wider law.

Then, in the summer of 2022, The Royal Parks said that even if the speed limits do not apply to cyclists, riders would still have action taken if they ride "recklessly".

In July, we reported that a group claiming to represent cyclists who use the park (Richmond Park Cyclists) had clashed with the charity over its speed limit advice for riders using the park.

This summer's Richmond Park Time Trials were also cancelled by The Royal Parks. Organised by the London Dynamo cycling club and first run in 2009, they were due to take place on 23 June and 7 July this year – and had been praised for their inclusivity and for providing a gateway into the sport, enabling beginners to compete on road bikes and on almost traffic-free roads due to their 6am starts.

London Dynamo Richmond Park time trials (Richmond Park Cyclists)

However, The Royal Parks cancelled this summer's events over fears riders would break the park's 20mph speed limit, a decision which left organisers "fuming" and arguing the decision had been clouded by "very irresponsible journalism" and that the alternative is "busy roads and fast-moving cars".

"Following several cycling-related incidents, it is our duty to take action to minimise the risk of accidents and our priority to ensure the safety of all cyclists together with other visitors," Richmond Park's manager said. September's London Duathlon in the park was subsequently also cancelled.

The Royal Parks has received plenty of criticism over the years for its approach to improving road safety in its parks. Many, including the London Cycling Campaign (LCC), have repeatedly asked why through-traffic is still allowed to use Richmond Park as a shortcut, the campaign calling the cancellation of well-organised events "weak" while "daily rat-runs" continue.

While some of Richmond Park's roads are closed to motor traffic on weekends, during weekdays the green space, which The Royal Parks proudly calls an "extraordinary landscape" that is also London's largest Site of Special Scientific Interest and a National Nature Reserve, is used as a cut-through for motorists driving between Kingston upon Thames, Richmond and Roehampton.

Richmond Park queues (via The Royal Parks, Twitter)

[Queue for parking on a sunny summer weekend in Richmond Park]

The LCC has campaigned for the park to be closed to through-traffic for years, arguing it would improve road safety and make them "far better for people walking, cycling and relaxing in". Specialist cycling insurance provider ETA Services Ltd recently also called it an "ongoing embarrassment" that The Royal Parks "allows this nature reserve to be used as a rat-run", the comments coming in response to the incident below.

Richmond Park collision (Twitter)

Dan is the road.cc news editor and joined in 2020 having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for The Non-League Paper. Dan has been at road.cc for four years and mainly writes news and tech articles as well as the occasional feature. He has hopefully kept you entertained on the live blog too.

Never fast enough to take things on the bike too seriously, when he's not working you'll find him exploring the south of England by two wheels at a leisurely weekend pace, or enjoying his favourite Scottish roads when visiting family. Sometimes he'll even load up the bags and ride up the whole way, he's a bit strange like that.

Add new comment

47 comments

Avatar
Perrin22 | 2 days ago
3 likes

Cyclists need to own their own mistakes and poor behaviour. I cycle, I have been cut down by cyclists and have been overtaken by faster cyclists in an aggressive manner. In parks where there will be more people why can't cyclists accept that they need to moderate their speed. Let's not go do the whataboutary, but actually accept cyclists need to be respectful of pedestrians and each other. Lone female older cyclist.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to Perrin22 | 2 days ago
10 likes

You sound like another person who doesn't know Richmond Park. Many people talk of cyclists moderating their behaviour as if the park is akin to a municipal urban park in which cyclists most certainly should slow down virtually to walking pace when there are pedestrians about. However, Richmond Park is better thought of as a large piece of countryside with roads running through it that just happens, fortuitously and delightfully, to be plonked down in the middle(ish) of a great city. There is no reason for pedestrians to be on the roads in the park apart from when crossing them and so no reason for cyclists to behave differently (or need different regulation) to the way they would on any other road.

Avatar
Pub bike replied to Rendel Harris | 2 days ago
7 likes

I can vouch for this.  Priory Lane for example runs from the junction with the A205 all the way to Stag Lodge.

Also, just to prove it is a public road, the police are equally as unlikely to prosecute a close pass on any part of Priory Lane, whether in the park or not.

Avatar
Pub bike replied to Rendel Harris | 1 day ago
3 likes

Rendel Harris wrote:

large piece of countryside with roads running through it

And it is only relatively recently that it ceased to be possible for motor vehicles to drive all the way around the park on those public roads.

Avatar
BIFFSTER replied to Rendel Harris | 1 day ago
0 likes

well no, there isnt a pavement in Richmond Park, so cyclists and pedestrians are sharing the same space. It's quite busy at times, so not really comparable to belting down a country B road without a pedestrian for miles, if at all. It isnt hard to show a little consideration as a cyclist.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to BIFFSTER | 1 day ago
6 likes

There are footpaths running alongside all the roads. There is no reason for pedestrians to be walking along the roads and in fact none of them do, they use the footpaths. You sound like another who doesn't actually know the park at all.

Avatar
E6toSE3 | 2 days ago
5 likes

Fully aware of Torygraph bot writing and the algorithms to select & distort data to suit their dying out readership and sad to see how a generally honest (right of centre) paper has degenerated to compete with Mail & Express.

But, tbf, I've posted before how, age 69, most friends and same generation family are no longer sprightly mobile, they're hard of hearing, sight failing, etc and more frightened of bikes and scooters in shared use areas than cars on roafs. They can't relate to idea of bikes doing 20, 30, even more mph.
I just did 43 kph for a fair distance on my 2018 Ultegra Roubaix. Bikes, wheels, tyres so much faster than my old 531 steel and aluminium-carbon frame bikes with 23C tyres at 120 psi. Bikes at Rouler show on Sunday were exotic with wheels at £3.5k to £4k+. Head down aero positions don't help you look ahead and I know how I can still get into a zone running, cycling, swimming where I'm oblivious to other people - I'm not alone in that tendency.
Reality is, Torygraph will have distorted hate material but there are many snippets of truth for them to extrapolate and distort. Walking and riding with most of my contemporaries is scary due to people using various forms of bicycle, scooter, trike recklessly. I'm sure such riders don't read this outlet or any other bike news media.

Avatar
bensynnock replied to E6toSE3 | 2 days ago
3 likes

Even a slow cyclist can seem fast to somebody who is standing still and not expecting to see a bike.

Avatar
Homebaker replied to bensynnock | 2 days ago
0 likes

Also if you're being told they are too fast, then you'll perceive then as such. As not local I don't know how many electric mopeds are increasing that perception.

Avatar
E6toSE3 | 2 days ago
6 likes

Last time I rode in Richmond Park was 2012. Had just dropped off son in Chiswick for a cricket match, looked forward for a few hours fast ride like the same time in 2011. Hot day. Trundled to park, could hardly ride up the slope at the gates. Ground round in bottom gear with grannies overtaking me. Wondered if someone had sacked all the oxygen out of the air. Massive heart attack sometime afterwards. Genetic, with my core fitness helping me survive and recover

Avatar
HLaB replied to E6toSE3 | 2 days ago
2 likes

Never cycled in Richmond Park myself but I reckon my core fitness stopped a bowel cancer breaking out of my stomach for long enough in my late 30s / early 40s, and because I was in good shape when it was dignosed I was in and out and on the road to recovery in no time.   Just before I could barely cycle up a slope either.

Avatar
Born_peddling | 2 days ago
5 likes

Keeping it short to avoid a rant:
Meanwhile parks else where are a backdrop for real crime: muggings, fatal stabbings and worse....But sure distract the public from the REAL issues.

Avatar
brooksby | 2 days ago
6 likes

Quote:

In a letter to Sir Chris Bryant, the Minister for Creative Industries, Arts and Tourism, The Royal Parks' chairman Loyd Grossman (the former presenter of MasterChef and Through the Keyhole) asked government to amend laws…

I wonder whether he'll be writing to the Transport Minister about funding for the London Philharmonic, or to the Foreign Secretary to talk about Universal Credit?

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to brooksby | 2 days ago
5 likes

It's like the joke, isn't it?

Man: "CAN I GET TWO FISH SUPPERS PLEASE!"

Person behind counter: "Excuse me - but this is a library!"

Man: "Oh, sorry!" *whispers* "Can I get two fish suppers, please?"

Avatar
brooksby replied to chrisonabike | 2 days ago
2 likes

In a way, it illustrates how the matter is perceived, doesn't it?  Mr Grossman clearly sees the management of the Royal Parks and all of the traffic therein as a matter for tourism not a matter for transport.

Avatar
the little onion replied to brooksby | 2 days ago
7 likes

Or maybe it reflects the fact that the governance of the royal parks lies with DCMS, not DfTransport. So I think it more reflects that these are weird places, rather than anything else.

Avatar
quiff replied to brooksby | 2 days ago
1 like

Well if they're doing leisure laps and not going from A to B on meaningful journeys... 

Avatar
brooksby replied to quiff | 1 day ago
3 likes

Like going to a cello lesson?  3

Avatar
brooksby | 2 days ago
7 likes

I'd wager that the Torgraph didn't have to push their FOI request particularly hard - I imagine that the Royal Parks have just been hoping begging praying for a newspaper to support their campaign…

Avatar
Pub bike | 2 days ago
6 likes

This seem to be just a very vindictive but baseless attack on cyclists in response to widespread acceptance of 20mph speed limits for motor vehicles.

Any debate about the dangers of cycling should collapse as soon as motor traffic KSI stats and the overwhelming health benefits of cycling are considered.

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to Pub bike | 1 day ago
3 likes

Pub bike wrote:

Any debate about the dangers of cycling should collapse as soon as motor traffic KSI stats and the overwhelming health benefits of cycling are considered.

Yes, where are the same figures for drivers, Telegraph?

Avatar
Mr Anderson | 2 days ago
1 like

For riders using Garmin RC715 (with latest FW), why not send video clips of incidents of speeding vehicles to Road.cc, to publish under a new theme

Avatar
stonojnr | 2 days ago
4 likes

Can't believe you didn't label it a dodgy dossier

Avatar
the little onion replied to stonojnr | 2 days ago
3 likes

sexed up?

Avatar
redimp | 2 days ago
7 likes

Can road.cc put in an FOI for the dossier on incidents involving motor vehicles and right an article on that, for balance?

Avatar
Clem Fandango | 2 days ago
11 likes

So it's basically a campaign to get cycling banned in the Parks then? Thereby removing a perceived impediment to rat running through, and laying the groundwork for future "get cycling banned" nonsense wherever decent fear-mongering folk may care to drive or better still, park.

All while simultaneously winning a battle in a manufactured culture war against an out group they can throw bigotry & hatred toward because "cyclists" are a uniquely safe target to our right whinge friends: a completey homogenous group with no defining characteristics such as ethnicity, gender, sexuality, age. Attacking groups like that can be somewhat problematic these days you see (bunch of woke nonsense what?).

Avatar
Rendel Harris | 2 days ago
11 likes

Quote:

The file from the summer reportedly includes a note from a runner who said he will not visit the park as "it is becoming so dangerous".

So where does this person run? There is an excellent 7.3 mile loop which runs all the way round the outer perimeter of the park, the Tamsin Trail, access to and use of which requires crossing no roads at all except where it passes the gates, where high-speed cycling is not an issue. There are numerous other footpaths suitable for running criss-crossing the park as well in areas where cycling is completely banned. The only conceivable way a runner could perceive the park to be dangerous would be if they chose to run on the road alongside the cars and bicycles.

Avatar
GMBasix replied to Rendel Harris | 2 days ago
7 likes

We need to be very careful about taking an approach that suggests that one vulnerable road user group should use the other facilities available to them and not share the road. That's a slippery slope that is already pointed at cyclists.

What really ought to be the case is that walkers, runners and cyclists should be confident of using parkroads and paths safely. And, to do that, the issue has been raised about removing motor vehicles.

I have no idea what the real problems of speed and volume of cycling through the park might be. More than happy to believe that, if the Telegraph "broke"* the "news", then the whole thing is manufactured. However, is there, within the silly fart noises, a reasonable call for more care and attention towards others from those seeking to train for speed?

(* "broke", of course, has more than one sense here)

Avatar
mdavidford replied to GMBasix | 2 days ago
5 likes

GMBasix wrote:

We need to be very careful about taking an approach that suggests that one vulnerable road user group should use the other facilities available to them and not share the road. That's a slippery slope that is already pointed at cyclists.

Definitely not a good idea to force either group to use slippery slopes.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to mdavidford | 2 days ago
5 likes

mdavidford wrote:

Definitely not a good idea to force either group to use slippery slopes.

What about skiers?

Pages

Latest Comments