Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Royal Parks cancels Richmond Park time trials over fears cyclists will break 20mph speed limit, after inquest into pedestrian fatality in “speeding” cyclist collision “brought this activity to people’s attention”

The races will be paused as the parks’ management “evaluates our position” – but “fuming” organisers say decision has been clouded by “very irresponsible journalism” and that the alternative is “busy roads and fast-moving cars”

Two time trial events set to take place in London’s Richmond Park over the next month have been cancelled by the Royal Parks, after the charity claimed that the media coverage surrounding the death of an elderly pedestrian hit by a “speeding” cyclist in Regent’s Park “brought this activity to people’s attention”, and that the time trials will “encourage cyclists to go faster” than the park’s 20mph limit for motorists.

The Royal Parks, the charity that manages London’s eight royal parks, has said it will “pause” the popular events while it evaluates its position, despite organisers and local cyclists arguing that the long-running time trials “pose no harm to anyone” and that any alternative routes comprise of “mostly busy roads and fast-moving cars”.

The Richmond Park Time Trials, organised by the London Dynamo cycling club and first run in 2009, until this year provided the only opportunity for cyclists to race against the clock in one of the capital’s royal parks.

Covering a 10.4-mile circuit in the south-west London park, the races – which were due to take place on 23 June and 7 July this year – have been praised for their inclusivity and for providing a gateway into the sport, enabling beginners to compete on road bikes and on almost traffic-free roads due to their 6am starts.

> Strava urges cyclists to "prioritise everyone's safety" following pedestrian fatality on popular segment, states "hazardous" segments can be flagged

However, it was confirmed last night by London Dynamo that this year’s time trials will not go ahead, after the Royal Parks decided to “pause” the events in the wake of the media coverage surrounding the inquest into the tragic death of an elderly pedestrian following a collision with a cyclist in Regent’s Park in June 2022.

Last month, a coroner’s inquest heard that cyclist Brian Fitzgerald was part of a group riding laps of Regent’s Park’s Outer Circle and travelling at between 25-29mph when he hit the 81-year-old pedestrian, causing her to suffer several broken bones and bleeding on the brain, injuries she died from in hospital two months later.

Fitzgerald was not prosecuted, however, for his role in her death, with the Metropolitan Police deeming there was “insufficient evidence for a real prospect of conviction”.

Following the inquest, the Royal Parks contacted Strava to request that the park’s Outer Circle segment be deleted, believing that this may deter cyclists from riding the route at high speeds, and prompting the ride-sharing app to remind its users and the public that “hazardous” segments can already be flagged and urging cyclists to “prioritise everyone’s safety”.

London Dynamo Richmond Park time trials (Richmond Park Cyclists)

> Cyclists blast proposals to introduce 10mph speed limit on Richmond Park hill

And now, the Royal Parks have moved to cancel the long-standing summer time trials in Richmond Park, due to the charity’s belief that “such events encourage cyclists to go faster than the 20mph motorist speed limit” in place in most of the park (despite those speed limits not applying to cyclists).

But the event’s organisers, who carry out a detailed risk assessment for the event alongside governing body Cycling Time Trials (though the Richmond Park time trials are notably exempt from CTT’s new guidelines concerning 20mph speed limits), say the decision has been clouded by “very irresponsible journalism” surrounding the recent coroner’s inquest.

> All cyclists must adhere to 20mph speed limits during time trials in Britain – as governing body cites safety concerns and risk of causing “public outrage”

“We are very upset about this decision as we have been arranging this event for 15 years and it has become one of our key events,” London Dynamo’s Andy Taylor told participants in an email sent on Wednesday night, informing them that full refunds will be sent out in the coming days.

“We also feel sorry for all of the entrants, sponsors, support staff, and volunteers who have been making plans to participate in these events. The TTs have become very popular within the local cycling community, offering an opportunity to ride in the unique environment of the park in relatively traffic-free conditions.

“We have worked very closely with TRP since the inception of our Club over 20 years ago and like to think that we have a close, collaborative relationship with them. The Time Trial events are operated under a license that we have with TRP and they have been kept fully informed of our plans and provided with all the relevant documentation in relation to the events.

“We are passionate about safety and risk management and put this at the centre of everything we do. As part of the planning for the events, we put together a very detailed risk assessment that was developed in conjunction with the national body for cycling time trials – Cycling Time Trials (CTT).”

Cyclists in Richmond Park with London skyline (copyright Simon MacMichael)

> “If we want to promote cycling, we have got to be responsible”: Cyclist calls for hit-and-run “MAMIL” to be “named and shamed” following head-on collision which left him unconscious

Taylor continued: “However, we became aware several weeks ago that TRP was having some reservations about such events in the light of, in my opinion, some very irresponsible journalism following a coroner’s inquest into the tragic death of a pedestrian in Regent’s Park two years ago that involved a cyclist.

“At that time, we submitted a written case to TRP for the retention of these events and offered to make any changes that they considered necessary to make these events even safer.

“Unfortunately, they have taken the decision to cancel the events with one of the key reasons being that they believe such events encourage cyclists to go faster than the 20mph motorist speed limit that is in place in most of the park.”

This morning, local campaign group Richmond Park Cyclists claimed that Royal Parks manager Paul Richards, explaining the decision to cancel the event, told them: “The cyclist involved in the fatal cycling crash was carrying out a time trial/speed laps. This has brought this activity to people’s attention.”

Richards is also claimed to have said that the Royal Parks “required a pause” in the events “to evaluate our position aligned across all [our] parks”.

“Richmond Park Cyclists learned of TRP’s intentions a month ago and we attempted to get them to change their decision,” the group said.

“London Dynamo, which has been running the RPTTs for 15 years, does a risk assessment for the events in conjunction with Cycling Time Trials, and there have never been any serious safety-related incidents to our knowledge.

“The RPTTs are inclusive events – anyone with a just basic road bike can take part. They are incredibly popular with all sections of the cycling community, pose no harm to anyone, and we will continue to make the case that the events should be reinstated next year.”

Richmond Park 03 copyright Simon MacMichael

> "Disgraceful that vulnerable road users have to put up with this": Renewed call from cyclists for drivers to be banned from using popular park as rat-run

Speaking to road.cc, London Dynamo chair Taylor again expressed his disappointment at the decision to cancel the races, which according to him the Royal Parks claimed was based not only on the time trials’ apparent “encouragement” of excess speed, but also the “threat” posed by the park’s deer population to the participants – but which Taylor believes owes more to the anti-cycling sentiment surrounding London’s parks in recent weeks.

“We’ve had a very longstanding, good relationship with the Royal Parks,” Taylor told road.cc. “While we’re very disappointed and upset with the decision, we understand where they’re coming from – but I still disagree with it.

“I think they’ve come under a lot of pressure following that media storm around the coroner’s inquest. There was a lot of anti-cycling sentiment around it, so I can see why they did it.

“We offered to meet them and collaborate with them. We did a very detailed risk assessment – every bump and corner in the park was assessed, we have lots of marshals.

“And there’s barely any traffic – most of the time we’re out before the gates have even opened for car traffic. So it’s very frustrating that they didn’t really engage with us and just decided to cancel it. I think they didn’t want to see themselves associated with an event linked to excessive speed in the park.”

Taylor said he first “caught wind” that the Royal Parks were raising concerns about the time trials last month, when the media coverage around the coroner’s inquest was at its height, leading to London Dynamo – along with the Richmond Park Cyclists group – deciding to lobby the charity to ensure the races could go ahead.

However, despite a prolonged back-and-forth exchange over email, Taylor claims the Parks’ board of directors declined the opportunity to meet face-to-face to discuss the issue.

The cycling club chair notes that one email he received from the Royal Parks claimed that the time trials were “promoting” cyclists riding faster than the 20mph speed limit for motorists and that the park’s deer “posed a danger” to those taking part.

“The deer can be a hazard, but that’s something all the riders are warned about,” he says. “It’s not a new thing, everyone knows the deer are there.

“Neither of these things are new – the 20mph speed limit has been there for quite some time. So you have to question the timing of the decision. They didn’t mention the Regent’s Park incident to us at all, but the two are clearly closely linked.”

With caterers, volunteers, and marketing commitments lined up, Taylor says he pushed the Royal Parks for a final decision this week, leading to the events’ cancellation last night – a decision the London Dynamo chair fears may prove permanent and extend beyond this year.

Richmond Park time trial (London Dynamo CC)

Responding to the event’s cancellation this morning, the time trials’ founder, Rebecca Slack, said she was “utterly fuming” at the news.

“It was to be my 17-year-old son’s first TT,” she wrote on social media. “The alternatives involve mostly busy roads and fast-moving cars – that’s why I founded them.”

A number of cyclists have also pointed out the irony inherent in the charity’s stance on an event that takes place in the early morning and twice a year.

“On that basis driving in the park should’ve been banned a long time ago,” one X, formerly Twitter, user wrote.

Taylor, meanwhile, is focused on securing another venue for the annual time trial events.

“I asked the Royal Park if this was all just a temporary reaction to current events, but they said it was likely to be permanent,” he says.

“We’re just thinking about what we do next. We’d like to keep a time trial event on our calendar, but it’s unlikely to be in Richmond Park. We’ll have to look elsewhere for another venue.”  

After obtaining a PhD, lecturing, and hosting a history podcast at Queen’s University Belfast, Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

20 comments

Avatar
MattieKempy | 5 months ago
1 like

The cancellation would be justified if they could guarantee that all drivers stuck to the 20mph limit. Bet they can't...

Avatar
Geordiepeddeler | 5 months ago
1 like

So if these time trials encourage cyclists to ride faster? What about the Tour of Britain? That hasn't been cancelled, Tour de France or the Giro? This is a lame blatent excuse to hate cycling and everything related to it.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to Geordiepeddeler | 5 months ago
1 like

Geordiepeddeler wrote:

So if these time trials encourage cyclists to ride faster? What about the Tour of Britain? That hasn't been cancelled, Tour de France or the Giro? This is a lame blatent excuse to hate cycling and everything related to it.

I agree with your last sentence, but all the other events you mention are held on closed roads, the Richmond Park TTs are held on roads open to the public so not really comparable.

Avatar
brooksby replied to Rendel Harris | 5 months ago
0 likes

Rendel Harris wrote:

Geordiepeddeler wrote:

So if these time trials encourage cyclists to ride faster? What about the Tour of Britain? That hasn't been cancelled, Tour de France or the Giro? This is a lame blatent excuse to hate cycling and everything related to it.

I agree with your last sentence, but all the other events you mention are held on closed roads, the Richmond Park TTs are held on roads open to the public so not really comparable.

I had wondered about that.  Surely the response, in that case, - if the RP were genuinely concerned about what they say they're concerned - is to close the park roads to traffic while the TT is going on?

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to brooksby | 5 months ago
2 likes

That would be ideal and given the fact that the TTs were slated to start at 6 am on Sundays with a small field, so probably finished before 8 am or even earlier, it surely wouldn't have been too much to ask for the gates to be opened a couple of hours later. Dog walkers, joggers et cetera who want to drive there and use the park that early could surely park near the gates – the residential parking restrictions in place around the park don't operate on Sundays – and walk through the pedestrian entrances.

Avatar
Rendel Harris | 5 months ago
9 likes

And the number of pedestrians who have been injured in these time trials in the last 15 years is…come on Royal Parks, we're waiting...

This has absolutely nothing to do with safety and everything to do with RP's obsessive dislike of cyclists.

Avatar
EK Spinner | 5 months ago
1 like

Judging by the Aberdeen Wheelers kit these events obviously bring money in from all over the country too.

Avatar
Dnnnnnn replied to EK Spinner | 5 months ago
2 likes

EK Spinner wrote:

Judging by the Aberdeen Wheelers kit these events obviously bring money in from all over the country too.

Not sure that diverting money to Richmond upon Thames from around the country is really something to shout about though!

Avatar
thereverent | 5 months ago
1 like

A shame as this seems a complete over reaction.

I think the Royal Parks were worried about the media hearing about th etime trials and writing up a scare story about it.

At that early hour on a sunday almost no-one is about (I'm sometimes in the park at that time), so ideal for the event.

Richmond Park management has mader some strange decisions over the last year with the needless (and widely ignored) chicanes and the strange 10mph signs on Broomfield Hill.

Avatar
JohannSW20 replied to thereverent | 5 months ago
0 likes

Could it be that TRP management is worried about riders training for the event. 

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to JohannSW20 | 5 months ago
3 likes

JohannSW20 wrote:

Could it be that TRP management is worried about riders training for the event. 

There are riders from all over London and farther afield training there every day, in their hundreds or even thousands on weekends, including a fair number of time triallists; stopping the small number who would be going in for this event having a practice run would make no substantive difference at all.

Avatar
JohannSW20 replied to Rendel Harris | 5 months ago
3 likes

I totally agree, I ride in the park most days and don't see much conflict. Others have commented that TRP are quite negative towards cyclists. I'm guessing they're looking for excuses🤷‍♂️

Avatar
arckuk | 5 months ago
9 likes

Gradually managing by a thousand cuts to strangle the joy from life and cycling so that we are forced to retreat of life in gridlock stuck behind the wheel as tools of the motor and petrochemical industries. Thanks!

I did this event a few years ago (just looked it up - 2016!) and can say that with my 05:11 start time the deer weren't even up and about for me to pose a lethal danger to them. A real shame that these events have been cancelled, they're one of the few times London cyclists can actually do a TT, are really well organised and in a fantastic setting when no-one else is around.

I'd guess that as much as the safety 'issues' quoted, the real threat is PR and hyperbolic headlines about the Royal Parks allowing lycra-clad cycle hooligan vigilante death trap murder MAMILs to do something not approved by the reactionary press. 

Avatar
rct | 5 months ago
2 likes

Are they cancelling the Duathalon in September as well?

Avatar
thereverent replied to rct | 5 months ago
1 like

I imagine not, as the income from that must be fairly decent.

Avatar
Velophaart_95 | 5 months ago
9 likes

FFS - what a load of garbage yet again by Royal Parks.......The management are really out of step, and need replacing by people who are up to the job - not idiots who have been well over-promoted.

If they're so concerned with the 20mph limit - how about banning motorised vehicles rom the parks? Yeah, it's not going to happen, is it? 

Avatar
Toffee | 5 months ago
13 likes

Besides the obvious lack of understanding around physics, cancelling a TT because people might ride fast is like cancelling a marathon because it might encourage people to run in the middle of the road.

Avatar
Brauchsel replied to Toffee | 5 months ago
2 likes

Maybe they'll think things through a bit more. People not in Richmond Park are very frequently knocked down and killed by people driving their cars not in Richmond Park. If their logic compels them to the conclusion that people should not be allowed to drive cars in Richmond Park, I'm all for it. 

Avatar
mctrials23 replied to Brauchsel | 5 months ago
2 likes

Yeah but wait until that is "brought to the publics attention". Boy are people going to be furious when they realise how dangerous cars are, how polluting and genearlly bad they are. 

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to mctrials23 | 5 months ago
0 likes

I think we know it but we are used to it or just don't care because it's rare that it happens to us and ours.

As Roadpeace point out: "Society tolerates road danger and road crime is not treated as real crime".

Recall - after some incredible campaigning / manipulation by the motor industry in the early days literally transferred the blame from perpetrators to victims, society then tolerated a much higher casualty rate than now for decades.  Yes, certainly different times then...

Latest Comments